Archives For leadership

Piper, John. Brothers, We Are Not Professionals. Nashville, TN.: B&H Publishing Group, 2013. 307 + xi pp. $14.99

brothers

John Piper’s book, Brothers, We Are Not Professionals, is an exhortation to pastors, calling them to minister with a heart in tune to God, rather than with a reliance upon, “an education, a set of skills, and a set of guild-defined standards which are possible without faith in Jesus” (x). Looking back on his own ministry, Dr. Piper remarks that his regrets lie not in the arena of professionalism, but rather in passion and prayer.

The original edition of the book was published in 2002 during the height of the evangelical church’s fascination with corporate leadership methods and structures. Pastors and church leaders sought to incorporate the latest pragmatic solution into the life of the church. Decisions were based upon asking, “What works?” rather than, “What is calling us to do?” Dr. Piper’s voice cut through the madness and called pastors back to caring for souls. He writes in the Preface of the new edition that, “nothing has happened in the last ten years to make me think this book is less needed” (ix). Though the drift of professionalism in churches today is present, it is subtly different. It may not resemble the three-piece suit of the CEO’s office, yet it remains while speaking more in terms of “communication or contextualization” (ix).

In order to combat this encroaching pressure to meet an ambiguous standard, Piper lays out thirty-six exhortations for pastors. These reminders all beckon ministers to remember and focus on the spiritual task of shepherding the flock entrusted to them. The new edition contains six new chapters clarifying some theological issues that Dr. Piper felt needed to be addressed, and some practical insights that he gained over the last ten years. Dr. Piper’s voice was sorely needed in 2002, and the need remains to this day for this wise instruction from a seasoned pastor who has remained steady despite the pressures, fads, and trends that can so quickly derail ministers from their primary task.

Summary

The book is built on thirty-six exhortations, each meriting its own chapter, and each calling the pastor back to his primary task. These exhortations can be categorized in terms of theological exhortations, practical insights, spiritual reminders, and deeply personal emphases that Dr. Piper embraced and exampled during his faithful ministry.

As one who has read Dr. Piper before might expect, he pounds the drum of God’s sovereign joy and supremacy as the heartbeat of ministry, writing, “Everything in our salvation is designed by God to magnify the glory of God” (13). Dr. Piper spends the first several chapters on these theological exhortations detailing for the reader the message that has been given to pastors to proclaim. He touches on subjects such as justification by faith, Christian Hedonism, and the love of God.

Other chapters may be categorized as practical insights shared by a seasoned pastor. He charges pastors to preach sermons saturated with the text of Scripture, rather than striving to entertain their hearers in order to gain an audience. He reminds pastors of the vast importance of studying the original languages of Scripture, stewarding their health, and reading Christian biographies for their own edification and joy.

He further provides encouragement for pastors to remain faithful by calling them to be men of prayer, and reminding them that the ministry of the Word is the centerpiece of faithful ministry. Throughout ministry, pastors will experience the natural drift of this world away from such spiritual practices, for they rarely appear on spreadsheets and data.

The last several chapters of the book hinge upon the emphases that have characterized Dr. Piper’s ministry over these last ten years. He calls pastors to emphasize the importance of global missions, to seek racial reconciliation, to passionately defend the unborn, and to love their wives as Christ loves the church.. These are emphases that, over time, came to the forefront of Dr. Piper’s ministry. Young pastors would be wise to consider these issues as repeated applications of the gospel.

Critique

One finds great difficulty critiquing a book written in the form of Dr. Piper’s Brothers, We Are Not Professionals. Most readers will find in John Piper a pastor with more insight, experience, and wisdom than they. However, there are a few points within the book that demand clarification.
One example of such needed clarification is that Dr. Piper’s passing references to major thrusts written in greater detail in his own voluminous writings demand further reading on the part of the reader. One simply cannot understand the concept of Christian Hedonism apart from Desiring God. One may remain unconvinced that God is the Gospel, unless they read Dr. Piper’s book, God is the Gospel. Many will find that his chapters on topics that he has written on before will be incomplete and brief.

The emphases that Dr. Piper lays out for his readers grow out of his own personal theological convictions concerning the sovereignty of God in salvation and the doctrines of grace. However generous he may strive to be in his writings, these emphases always come to the forefront in his writings. Those who agree with him on these points (or even most of them) may not even take notice of the foundation. However, those who differ with his soteriological foundation may find greater disunity at the point of application.

One other potential critique lies in Dr. Piper’s chapter on the issue of baptism. As a Baptist, this reviewer resonates with his argument for believer baptism and the importance therein. However, in taking up the argument, Dr. Piper has opened himself to criticism from both sides. Some who maintain a paedo-baptist distinctive may take offense that Dr. Piper has raised this issue, and presented a defense of believer baptism over against infant baptism in a book that would otherwise appeal across denominational lines. Others who hold to credo-baptist convictions may react negatively to Dr. Piper’s emphasis that this is not a primary doctrine, and something that should not “cut us off from shared worship and ministry with others who share more important things with us” (161). Historically, one can easily see that these different understandings of baptism have always separated believers, often with violence.

Conclusion

John Piper’s, Brothers, We Are Not Professionals is the needed reminder to abandon the notion that faithful ministry is predicated upon some professional veneer and to embrace the deeply spiritual reality that they are called to something else altogether. For, he writes, “there is an infinite difference between the pastor whose heart is set on being a professional and the pastor whose heart is set on being the aroma of Christ, the fragrance of death to some and eternal life to others (2 Cor. 2:15-16)” (3).

John Piper, Brothers, We Are Not Professionals


I received this book free from the publisher through the B&H book review bloggers program. I was not required to write a positive review. The opinions I have expressed are my own.

The Conviction to Lead

January 18, 2013 — Leave a comment

Mohler, Albert. The Conviction to Lead. Minneapolis, Minn.: Bethany House Publishers, 2012. 222 pp. $22.99.

mohler

In his new book, The Conviction to Lead, Dr. Albert Mohler – president of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary – lays out twenty-five foundational principles of leadership. In doing so, he presents a new take on leadership, and he is well-aware that this is not the most common approach to leadership. In fact, he states his goal up front, “my goal is to change the way you think about leadership” (15).

And before one scoffs at this new perspective, one must take into consideration the massive imprint that Dr. Mohler has left on Southern Seminary during his tenure as president. His administration has returned the institution to its theologically conservative roots in the face of great upheaval and opposition. His track record speaks for itself, and when he chooses to speak on the subject of leadership, one will always find a willing listener in me.

Conviction, according to Dr. Mohler, is what is missing from the contemporary leadership discussion. He writes, “Leadership that really matters is convictional” (24). For far too long we have sought to draw a clear line of distinction between what a leader does and what a leader believes. This sharp, marked delineation (and one need not peruse modern history for very long to see this trend stand out), has weakened a generation. Instead, Dr. Mohler argues that beliefs are central to leadership.

“Leadership is all about putting the right beliefs into action, and knowing, on the basis of convictions, what those right beliefs and actions are” (26).

Copious amounts of books have been written on the subject of leadership. For decades, pastors and church leaders have bought into the discussion and have reorganized church models and structures to resemble those of the most successful businesses. In fact, for many pastors, Jim Collins’ Good to Great is required reading. What I appreciate about Dr. Mohler’s book is that it doesn’t attempt to press a synthetic grid upon leadership and force the reader through the mold. Rather, his vision for leadership is as applicable in the secular business world as it is in the context of ministry for the very reason that it starts at the very heart of the matter.

We would do well to take this new perspective on leadership to heart.

Albert Mohler, The Conviction to Lead


I received this book free from the publisher through the Bethany House Publishers book review bloggers program. I was not required to write a positive review. The opinions I have expressed are my own.

“Sell your shirt and buy books.”

Alexander Whyte on Books

Train together with one another; compete together, run together, suffer together, rest together, get up together, as God’s manager’s, assistants, and servants.

Ignatius, early 2nd Century Bishop of Antioch’s Charge to the Church

You’re not innovative!

December 14, 2011 — Leave a comment

In ministry, it’s become the trend for young pastors and church planters to attempt to describe themselves as Creatives. I don’t necessarily think that’s a bad thing. I mean, we need to ensure that we’re faithful to the God who called us to ministry, and to the proclamation of His Word rather than our own creative ideas. But I do believe that there’s a level of creativity that is important to our calling.

Let’s face it, we proclaim a two thousand year old message. If we’re proclaiming that message in such a way as to incite bored yawns, we’re failures.

But…

What makes me completely insane is when I read or hear a pastor describe himself as a creative or innovative, and yet when I look at their “innovative” ministry, I can tell exactly which books he’s reading, and pastors he’s listening to. In some instances, I’ve seen them use the exact same graphics. In others, they’ve just grunged things up a little, added overused buzz-words like, “missional,” “authentic,” and “community.”

(image via flickr: The Infatuated)

For the sake of clarification, let’s be sure we’re defining terms the same way.

Innovation: the action or process of makimg changes in something established, esp. by introducing new methods, ideas, or products

Innovation means that you are coming up with fresh ideas.

Innovation does not mean that you’re rehashing someone else’s idea that gained them national attention.

That’s called plagiarism.

So why write this? Why would it bother me so much?

Because it used to be me.

I used to try to fit that mold because I thought that was the only way to do it. So I did what everyone else did. I cast the same vision for a church as everyone else. In fact, I did a ton of research to study what mega-churches were doing, and cast a vision for that as though it were my own idea.

Some called it pragmatism.
Some called it studied.
Some called it wisdom.
I called it innovative.

But then the best possible thing occurred. God refused to allow it to happen. My attempt to plant a church was a tremendous failure.

And God used that failure to force my reliance upon Him, to reveal Himself more through His Word, and to force me to my knees in obedience.

And when that happened, it became incredibly more important that I fulfill what God has called me to.

I’m not innovative. And, in the ministry culture that we live in, that’s original enough.

Who else is ready to speak up and admit it?

I’m not innovative!

Recently, a good friend of mine let a beloved staff person go due to a moral failure. And while he and I had discussed the exact scenario before (when both of us were relatively disconnected from the issue), when it actually happened in his ministry, it was much harder.

And, common in most cases, both sides take issue with his response. He removed this person from ministry, getting them Biblical counseling to deal with his addiction, and seeking his restoration to the church body.

The question for pastors is this, “Where do we differentiate between those to whom we show grace, and those that we draw a hard line and remove from ministry?”

Take the jump to read my thoughts.

Servant Leadership

October 13, 2011 — Leave a comment

A few years ago, I participated in a church planter assessment that required all of the candidates to participate in case studies and hypothetical situations. After each session, each participant would fill out a sheet of paper where they would write down who took the primary leadership role, who was the most help, who was the least helpful, etc.

The last box on the sheet was “Who displayed servant leadership the best?”

The problem was that there was no definition of exactly what servant leadership is.

Read my attempt to clarify and define servant leadership here

Last week, Brandon Levering posted five ways established churches should think like plants. I thought it was brilliant. Statistics show that the vast majority (some studies cite upwards of 80%) of those coming to Christ, do so in churches under 3 years old. Perhaps there’s something inherent about their status as a young church that others can learn from.

  1. Church plants clearly define their mission and keep it before them in everything they do.
  2. Church plants feel an acute sense of urgency to engage in evangelism.
  3. Church plants tend to better understand the culture they’re engaging.
  4. Church plants use a wider portion of the congregation in service.
  5. Church plants are more likely to think strategically about planting more churches.

(Read the entire post here.)

Let’s flip the title for a second though, and ask this (because it’s a healthy question to ask):

What are some things that church plants can learn from established churches?

We’ve all heard the statistics. More pastors quit on Mondays than any other day of the week. And while it would be easy to sit here and discuss all of the reasons why, I felt it better to provide just a handy tip that has served me so well over the last year or so.

Check out the full post over at RookiePastor.com

image via flickr: doronko

Ever since our family moved from Wichita to Fort Worth, I’ve been praying for God to open the door for me to pastor a church here while attending seminary at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary. I’ve posted my resume where I can, kept an eye on the job boards, and prayerfully submitted my resume to several churches.

Obviously this season has tested our family, and forced us to a deeper reliance on Christ. We’ve learned (and are continually learning) to pray for our daily bread and to trust that He will provide it.

One of the most important lessons that I’m learning in this time is the difference between could and called.

Some positions could be a fit. My particular experiences could serve the congregation well, and my family could fit and love the people. Ultimately, it could work out long-term, but not if something more important is missing.

If I’m not called to that church, it won’t be a fit. If my family isn’t called to minister to the congregation, we may love them and treasure their friendship, but it just won’t work. Regardless of what could be, without being called, it won’t.

My prayer is that every church would discover the man that God has called to lead them, not just the man who could.